So, I've finished this book. Just like I said in the last post, she included a lot of horrible things that happened in her life, except in this book she mixed a lot of problems regarding her personal family life and other topics like sexism rather than just problems regarding racism.
Yes, all of the events she included were some horrible things that a person should not have to go through (call me redundant, but they're just so horribly horrible I don't know what other word would be appropriate). But I don't think it would have sounded half as terrible to me if she didn't express her words like this.
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings is of Maya Angelou's life from when she was three to when she was sixteen. This book was published when she was 41, so she couldn't have possibly remembered every single detail of the exact emotions and happenings of all the events she wrote in this book (she actually might remember most stuff because she's super brilliant at memorizing but that's not the point). Her use of imagery must have stressed or exaggerated some parts. But when she was telling the readers these stories, I found myself believing every single detail she was saying. It was like a suspension of disbelief, except it was mostly true. It made me feel that way because it works both as nonfiction and fiction. If someone had told me, "This is fiction," I would have believed it. If someone had told me, "This is nonfiction," I still would have believed it. This book is someone's life reincarnated into a story. For example, there was a descriptive part in the middle of the book where she told the readers about her graduation with excitement. She narrates, "In the Store I was the person of the moment. The birthday girl. The center... My class was wearing butter-yellow pique dresses, and Momma launched out on mine. She mocked the yoke into tiny crisscrossing puckers, then shirred the rest of the bodice. Her dark fingers ducked in and out of the lemony cloth as she embroidered raised daisies around the hem" (Angelou 171). It was as descriptive as a novel but still a true story.
Of this true story of Marguerite, a strong figure of her life is Momma, her grandmother. She had been raised by Momma since she was three. Momma was a strong and influential figure to not only Marguerite but her entire community. Angelou recalls, "I saw only her power and strength. She was taller than any woman in my personal world...In church, when she was called upon to sing, she seemed to pull out plugs from behind her jaws and the huge sound would pour over the listeners and throb in the air...She was the only Negro woman in Stamps referred to once as Mrs" (Angelou 46-47). These traits of Momma are similar to other female activists, but the figure that reminded me most of Momma was Cleopatra. Just like Momma was the only woman in her area to be called Mrs., Cleopatra was one of the only female pharaohs of Egypt. They were both married at a certain point, but remained single at the end, and by doing so I think that it helped them maintain their sense of power. They were both determined to protect their sons, although they never seemed to directly shows true love for anyone. They're both people of inspiration.
 |
| Cleopatra was a significant woman leader, just like Maya Angelou's grandmother. |
That felt like a short but long read. I'd feel like I absorbed a ton of interesting information, but it would only have been about five pages past where I started. It was never tedious nor hard but I felt like I had to devote a lot of time into it. I guess that part blocked me from enjoying it 100%, so it wasn't a panacea. I did enjoy it though, and it felt like it left a mark inside of me.
Oh, and by the way, I've noticed that a lot of people put fun things at the end of their blogs. Yeah, I guess I'm acting "mainstream" but I think that's better than letting readers fall asleep with only literature-related stuff. The only thing close to a panacea I've ever found was chocolate. So enjoy a
chocolate truffle recipe.